Sunday 24 April 2016

Stop Psychotherapy Takeover Interview The Mind Vault TV Team, Ava Schriver Dunn and Kevin Dunn, interviewed Stop Psychotherapy Takeover Co-Founder Grace Joubarne and our Canadian healthcare freedom legal expert, Trueman Tuck, on November 5th, 2015

The Issue

An extremely dangerous amendment to Ontario’s laws has made 'treating' human issues of thought, cognition, mood, emotional regulation, perception or memory the newest ‘controlled act’ that only select authorized individuals may do.

If it becomes enforceable, this secretly created and deceptively worded law will mean that verbal or nonverbal interaction with another person with the intent of holistically educating or assisting them to wellness could lead virtually anyone to a year in jail and/or a $25,000 fine for doing 'psychotherapy' without a license.

This law could become enforceable any day now.

Sounds impossible? Read our ‘Legislation’ and ‘Legal Opinion’ pages to learn more.


Legal Opinion

Watch the Stop phsycotherapy takeover interview here.






April 24, 2016

More Natural Healthcare Practitioners Eliminated by Premier Wynne

We are getting many contacts from acupuncturists, family therapists, spiritual care professionals, lay psychotherapists and others who cannot believe they have been betrayed by their government this way.

Acupuncture, for instance, was never proven to be a risk to the public and certainly, according to the statistics to be shared in future newsletters, only 6 people world-wide were negatively affected by acupuncture, and only by one small technique that few of them use and is typically very safe.

However, the real criticism Big Pharma has about acupuncture is that it is a very safe, cost-effective option to addictive pain medications that are creating the epidemic of drug addiction and deaths we experience today.

But again, the evil-doers on their black chargers, who want all drug-free options for pain management eliminated because they interfere with Big Pharma profiteering, swooped in to claim that all of acupuncture was dangerous.

As they did with the senseless psychotherapy legislation designed to put some 10,000 safe and effective professionals out of work, Premier Wynne’s former henchwoman  and Minister of Health, Deb Matthews, made the entire profession of acupuncture a controlled act, instead of restricting to those acupuncturists trained in that technique the one small technique that rarely causes an adverse effect.

Please help with whatever financial contributions you can spare atwww.stoppsychotherapytakeover.ca/donations/.   Also, PRINT OFF THEFORMAL PETITION and help us gather signatures to be taken to the Ontario Legislature.

Of course, as previously explained, controlled acts are not to be used to control entire professions, but only the specified and identifiable act within the profession that is proven risky.  In violation of the superior laws, this government seeks any excuse to control even the safest of techniques of every profession and restrict the entire profession to those who later dilute then eliminate it…the medical-model advocates.

Worse, front-line healthcare services are cut back instead of bureaucratic waste and redundancy being eliminated, and safe, effective front-line healthcare professionals have to become ‘registered’ and pay many thousands of dollars in ‘fees’ just for the right to work.  You can understand why many are calling it outright extortion.

Premier Wynne, psychologists and psychiatrists seeking to protect their ‘turf’, and the pharmaceutical drug industry whose recent increase in drug prices she applauded, manufactured a previously non-existent profession to be defined as needed in order to capture and eliminate all natural therapies and approaches to wellness.

TOGETHER WE CAN PULL OUT ALL STOPS AND GET THIS INSANITY STOPPED

LEARN HOW YOU CAN HELP NOW  http://www.stoppsychotherapytakeover.ca/








3 comments:

  1. Guarantee of Rights and FreedomsMarginal note:Rights and freedoms in Canada

    1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

    Fundamental FreedomsMarginal note:Fundamental freedoms

    2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

    (a) freedom of conscience and religion;

    (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;

    (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and

    (d) freedom of association.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Legal RightsMarginal note:Life, liberty and security of person

    7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

    Marginal note:Search or seizure

    8. Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure.

    Marginal note:Detention or imprisonment

    9. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.

    Marginal note:Arrest or detention

    10. Everyone has the right on arrest or detention

    (a) to be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;

    (b) to retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right; and

    (c) to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.

    Marginal note:Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

    11. Any person charged with an offence has the right

    (a) to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;

    (b) to be tried within a reasonable time;

    (c) not to be compelled to be a witness in proceedings against that person in respect of the offence;

    (d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

    (e) not to be denied reasonable bail without just cause;

    (f) except in the case of an offence under military law tried before a military tribunal, to the benefit of trial by jury where the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment;

    (g) not to be found guilty on account of any act or omission unless, at the time of the act or omission, it constituted an offence under Canadian or international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations;

    (h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again; and

    (i) if found guilty of the offence and if the punishment for the offence has been varied between the time of commission and the time of sentencing, to the benefit of the lesser punishment.


    ReplyDelete
  3. http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html

    ReplyDelete