Tuesday, 24 May 2016

The Truth About Bernie Sanders And why he is better than Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump together. Bernie is the Ace in the hole in this rigged came of cards.

When you investigate and read up on who controls the world and for how long, one only needs to go to the british empire and its control over the united states throughout history and from birth of the american nation.

A good book on the real history of colonization of North America by Great Britain.   Crisis   It tells the real story of politics in the United States.   A history every Canadian should read to understand not only our distaste for our american neighbours, but our own political background.  And every american should read before voting their constitutional liberties to clinton or trump.

Read Crisis and then listen to Bernie's historical speaches and read between the lines.

Bernie has been fighting for liberty and justice from the very cabals we call government for years.

Now listen to Bernie in 2016.

Saturday, 21 May 2016

You need to get a fix on the world you live in.  You need to get a fix on the here and now.  I’m going to give you a sentence to swallow.  We are at the turning point of civilization You need to swallow that.  That’s the biggest sentence your gonna hear.   We’re at the turning point of civilization.   It is a privilege to be alive right now.  People will write about this time we’re living.  They’ll wonder how we navigated it.  They’ll wonder why we didn’t recognize what this moment was all about.   They’ll wonder why we slept through it.  They’ll wonder how come we didn’t read the signs. There isn’t one particle of life that isn’t being affected by the things that are going on now.  So I’m going to tell you again.  We’re at the turning point of civilization. I’ve been an avid reader of History since I was 7 years old.  Not a week goes by in my life that I have not read Historyl.  My background is Military History and then the study of god.  So those are my two things – Heaven and Hell.  For me War the study of war has been one of the greatest intellectual allies I have ever had.  As well as the study of God. Why?  Because war is the great change agent of all times.  War/  And it Is war that has advanced societies  or changed the shape of the world.  What we are experiencing now and what has launched the phsycic era that we live in, was a war.  WWII. So I’m going to take you back there.   Because in order for you to understand the world we’re living in now,  we have to enter through WWII.

FootFlexes: You Need to Get a Fix on the World You Live In -2016:

This is one video you want to see. Carolyn Myss Key Note Address Atlanta 2012

You need to get a fix on the world you live in.  You need to get a fix on the here and now.  I’m going to give you a sentence to swallow.

We are at the turning point of civilization

You need to swallow that.  That’s the biggest sentence your gonna hear.   We’re at the turning point of civilization.   It is a privilege to be alive right now.  People will write about this time we’re living.  They’ll wonder how we navigated it.  They’ll wonder why we didn’t recognize what this moment was all about.   They’ll wonder why we slept through it.

So I’m going to tell you again.  We’re at the turning point of civilization.

Monday, 16 May 2016

The bottom line is that Hillary Clinton, while Secretary of State, recklessly caused an evasion of whatever safeguards existed in the standard government handling of e-mails pertaining to government business. She recklessly created a non-accountable private system, with knowledge that classified information could pass through the system and be hacked without detection from government information technology security experts. 

Clinton E-mail Trove Likely in Russian Hands


Joseph Klein,

Putting her own needs before national security.

Thousands of e-mails from Hillary Clinton’s private, unsecured server, created while she served as Secretary of State, are reportedly in the possession of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). The SVR is said to have gained access to the e-mails, of which it made copies, through its monitoring of a Romanian computer hacker named Marcel Laz─âr Lehel (aka Guccifer). Guccifer had learned about the existence of Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail account after accessing the e-mails of her close confidante and informal adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, with whom Hillary had extensive correspondence during her term as Secretary of State.

A report attributed to Russia’s Security Council indicates that an internal battle has broken out over whether to publicly release the e-mails between the Director of the FSB, Alexander Bortnikov, and Chairwoman of the Council of Federation, Valentina Matviyenko. The latter had authorized a release of some of the e-mails to Russia Today (RT) back on March 20, 2013. Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service director expressed alarm at the release, primarily because of concerns that the release would reveal to U.S. intelligence services how Russia used its monitoring of Guccifer to obtain Clinton’s e-mails. He had good reason to be concerned. U.S. authorities worked with their Romanian counterparts to follow the trail that led to Guccifer’s arrest in Romania.

In March 2016, Chairwoman Matviyenko is said to have called for a total release of the e-mails, in part to influence the U.S. presidential election. Ms. Matvivenko reportedly cited Russian President Vladimir Putin’s positive statements about Donald Trump and claimed that Hillary Clinton was not liked by the Russian people.

Perhaps it was just a coincidence, but Guccifer was quickly extradited to the United States from Romania at the end of March. He is facing a nine-count federal indictment on various charges, including wire fraud, cyberstalking, identify theft, unauthorized access to computers and obstruction of justice.

The FBI requested the extradition, according to the Romanian government. Thus, it would be logical to assume that the FBI has been speaking with Guccifer regarding the server, although the agency has not officially confirmed such discussions.

 “Because of the proximity to Sidney Blumenthal and the activity involving Hillary’s emails, [the timing] seems to be something beyond curious,” saidRon Hosko, former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division from 2012-2014, as quoted by Fox News. “Here is an individual in a relatively poor Eastern European country who was able to intrude on sensitive emails about activities in Benghazi.”

The mainstream media had sought to protect Hillary Clinton from revelations about Guccifer’s role in the hacking of her private e-mail server as long as it could. For example, NBC News reporter Cynthia McFadden had interviewed Guccifer from a Bucharest prison and elicited Guccifer’s first-hand account that Hillary’s server was “not safe at all.” NBC sat on this interview for more than a month. Only after Guccifer was extradited to the U.S. and appeared to be of interest to the FBI did NBC have to acknowledge the potential importance of what Guccifer had to say regarding Hillary’s unsafe server.

On May 4th, NBC finally issued a press release about the interview that it planned to run several days later. Even then, NBC played defense for Hillary’s campaign, emphasizing in the press release that “Guccifer could provide no documentation to back up his claims, nor did he ever release anything on-line supporting his allegation, as he’d done frequently in prior hacks.” Of course, the best proof would be the released e-mails themselves, which RT had reported were obtained from Guccifer, complete with excerpts, in its March 20, 2013 article.

The New York Times has also played defense for the Clinton team. In an article appearing on May 11th entitled “Use of Unclassified Email Systems Not Limited to Clinton,” New York Times reporter Steven Lee Myers claimed it was regular government practice to send e-mails that may contain classified information over unclassified government computer networks used for more routine business. These unclassified government computer networks even had a nickname – “low side.”

“A review of the 30,322 emails from Mrs. Clinton’s private server that the State Department has made public under the Freedom of Information Act provides an extensive record of how such sensitive information often looped throughout President Obama’s foreign policy apparatus on unclassified systems, from embassies to the United Nations to the White House,” Mr. Myers wrote. “Many of the emails were sent over the State Department’s unclassified system, state.gov, which is considered secure but not at the level of the State Department’s system for emailing classified information.”

While acknowledging that Hillary Clinton’s private server “was assumed to be even less secure than the State Department’s ‘low side,’” the New York Times reporter made sure to add that “the unclassified servers at some government agencies have been hacked in recent years.”

Undoubtedly, the government’s own computer network systems need to be better secured. However, that is beside the point. For her own selfish reasons, Hillary Clinton set up a rogue private e-mail system that was not subject to any government oversight. Unlike with respect to its own systems, the government was not able to monitor the use of Hillary’s private system. It was not in a position to periodically inspect and make decisions on whether to upgrade security. And there was no automatic archiving of e-mails passing through the private system for document retention purposes.

The bottom line is that Hillary Clinton, while Secretary of State, recklessly caused an evasion of whatever safeguards existed in the standard government handling of e-mails pertaining to government business. She recklessly created a non-accountable private system, with knowledge that classified information could pass through the system and be hacked without detection from government information technology security experts. Some of the e-mails reportedly involved national defense, including one determined to be “secret” sent by her aide Huma Abedin, which dealt with North Korea’s ballistic missile launch. Another e-mail dealt with drone activities, particularly in Pakistan.

At minimum, therefore, it is highly likely that Hillary Clinton violated 18 U.S. Code § 793 (f):

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1)through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. [Emphasis added.]


Hillary Clinton should be charged with espionage. Her husband, while president, dealt with Enron! Enron, the largest energy scandal in history, took down creative accounting firm Arthur Anderson who shredded confidential information and in fact created the Sarbanes Oxley Act for records and information management,. she is fully aware she did something wrong

In a news conference last March, she said: “I opted for convenience to use my personal email account, which was allowed by the State Department, because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.”

During a Democratic debate on March 9, she acknowledged using poor judgment but maintained she was permitted to use her own server: “It wasn’t the best choice. I made a mistake. It was not prohibited. It was not in any way dis­allowed.”


Re read the first paragraph above

I opted for-  this is  Hillary's decisionto break the laws she knew existed.
which was allowed - hillarys interpretation because staff were trying to get her to stop using her personal blackberry for state business.  Staff could not get her to stop using it. 

She kept maintaining she was permitted or allowed and what she is really saying is the state department knew full well she was breaking the laws regarding records and state owned information, and allowed or permitted her to do it, and not only that, her private foundation , jointly owned with a former impeached president, now had not just copies of state department records, but original emails on their corporate servers.  And Hillary deleted 35,000 of them and handed over 50,000.   Only the corporate archivist, in this case the state department of the united states of america' duly appointed record keeper by law, can authorize the destruction of state records.......whether on her server or the state departments server.

The state department is as guilty as clinton in destroying secret documents of the government and concerning mega energy and oil deals behind the publics back.


Clinton , as an employee or representative of the government, does not own the i formation.   Therefore, if russian servers ping or hack her servers, she now becomes a spy.....and the espionage act comes into play.

Thats 85,000 top secret documents on the servers of the Clinton Foundation a private corporation like the eugenist Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Now, Bill Clinton has served two terms as president.  By law thats it.  But, if Hillary is elected, Bill becomes secretary of state, at hillarys appointment of him, and viola, hes now in line for a third term if she dies or is impeached.  

Because of enron, which happened one month after 9/11, all presidential files are sealed in the united states.  

Bill clinton was involved politically with Ken Lay of Enron....As was George Bush, who being an oil magnet, saw Enron as a threat because their game was electricity and natural gas, and their very own stock market to sell every energy commodity on the planet.....

Now Enron and Arthur Anderson shredded information and Ken Lay faced several years in jail....but   he died before convicted.......like hitler, him and his wife linda have disappeared from the news.....

And any refrence to hillary doing her job as secretary of state like general collin powel did, meaning using personal emails and blackberries, should include this refrence of the clinton connection to the state department in 2006, by the clintons. 

Author Of Enron Book Says CBS REMOVED References To Clinton Administration In TV Movie
Media Research Center via E-Mail | Janurary 7, 2003 | Brent Baker 

Posted on Tue Jan 07 2003 08:39:39 GMT-0500 (EST) by PJ-Comix

Update: The author on whose book CBS based its movie about Enron revealed that the movie's producers removed his references to the Clinton administration.

As reported in the January 6 CyberAlert, CBS's Sunday night movie, The Crooked E: The Unshredded Truth About Enron, got in a few very straight shots at the company's ties to the Bush administration, but made no mention of links to the Clinton team or financial support of any Democrats. In addition to several references to Ken Lay meeting with President Bush and Vice President Cheney, the TV movie superimposed images of left-wing actor Mike Farrell, who played Lay, into photos with the real George H.W. and George W. Bush, as well as Cheney.

Alert CyberAlert reader David Fite alerted me to how Brian Cruver, the Enron employee on whose book, Anatomy of Greed: The Unshredded Truth From an Enron Insider, the CBS movie was based, told the Houston Chronicle that by focusing solely on the company's ties to the Bush administration the movie distorted his first-hand recounting.

The January 2 Chronicle quoted Cruver: "In the book, as far as connections to the Bush administration, to me it was a bipartisan corruption, and I have as much information in the book about connections to (Bill) Clinton as (George W.) Bush.

ENRON......The Movie.     Why is electricity and energy so high in cost?  Because of Enron.... and the smartest guys in the room.....  watch and weep......because if clinton gets elected, the world is in trouble.  Big time.  And president Kennedy is rolling in his grave at just what has become of the democratic  process in america.  

  • "BERNIE OR BUST For 2016"

Friday, 13 May 2016

Wednesday, 11 May 2016

1960 Democratic Convention.....president elect, john F. Kennedy Speech to the Party.......Read it and determine for yourself, that in 2016 these very words are the reason Bernie Sanders is Running Against Hillary Clinton .....Bernie is reminding america that since 1960, and the civil rights movements and world domination of the banks , the democratic party has turned against the american citizen, and the world.....

Governor Stevenson, Senator Johnson, Mr. Butler, Senator Symington, Senator Humphrey, Speaker Rayburn, Fellow Democrats, I want to express my thanks to Governor Stevenson for his generous and heart-warming introduction.

It was my great honor to place his name in nomination at the 1956 Democratic Convention, and I am delighted to have his support and his counsel and his advice in the coming months ahead.

With a deep sense of duty and high resolve, I accept your nomination.

I accept it with a full and grateful heart--without reservation-- and with only one obligation--the obligation to devote every effort of body, mind and spirit to lead our Party back to victory and our Nation back to greatness.

I am grateful, too, that you have provided me with such an eloquent statement of our Party's platform. Pledges which are made so eloquently are made to be kept. "The Rights of Man"--the civil and economic rights essential to the human dignity of all men--are indeed our goal and our first principles. This is a Platform on which I can run with enthusiasm and conviction.

And I am grateful, finally, that I can rely in the coming months on so many others--on a distinguished running-mate who brings unity to our ticket and strength to our Platform, Lyndon Johnson--on one of the most articulate statesmen of our time, Adlai Stevenson--on a great spokesman for our needs as a Nation and a people, Stuart Symington--and on that fighting campaigner whose support I welcome, President Harry S. Truman-- on my traveling companion in Wisconsin and West Virginia, Senator Hubert Humphrey. On Paul Butler, our devoted and courageous Chairman.

I feel a lot safer now that they are on my side again. And I am proud of the contrast with our Republican competitors. For their ranks are apparently so thin that not one challenger has come forth with both the competence and the courage to make theirs an open convention.

I am fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party, by nominating someone of my faith, has taken on what many regard as a new and hazardous risk--new, at least since 1928. But I look at it this way: the Democratic Party has once again placed its confidence in the American people, and in their ability to render a free, fair judgment. And you have, at the same time, placed your confidence in me, and in my ability to render a free, fair judgment--to uphold the Constitution and my oath of office--and to reject any kind of religious pressure or obligation that might directly or indirectly interfere with my conduct of the Presidency in the national interest. My record of fourteen years supporting public education--supporting complete separation of church and state--and resisting pressure from any source on any issue should be clear by now to everyone.

I hope that no American, considering the really critical issues facing this country, will waste his franchise by voting either for me or against me solely on account of my religious affiliation. It is not relevant. I want to stress, what some other political or religious leader may have said on this subject. It is not relevant what abuses may have existed in other countries or in other times. It is not relevant what pressures, if any, might conceivably be brought to bear on me. I am telling you now what you are entitled to know: that my decisions on any public policy will be my own--as an American, a Democrat and a free man.

Under any circumstances, however, the victory we seek in November will not be easy. We all know that in our hearts. We recognize the power of the forces that will be aligned against us. We know they will invoke the name of Abraham Lincoln on behalf of their candidate--despite the fact that the political career of their candidate has often seemed to show charity toward none and malice for all.

We know that it will not be easy to campaign against a man who has spoken or voted on every known side of every known issue. Mr. Nixon may feel it is his turn now, after the New Deal and the Fair Deal--but before he deals, someone had better cut the cards.

That "someone" may be the millions of Americans who voted for President Eisenhower but balk at his would be, self-appointed successor. For just as historians tell us that Richard I was not fit to fill the shoes of bold Henry II--and that Richard Cromwell was not fit to wear the mantle of his uncle--they might add in future years that Richard Nixon did not measure to the footsteps of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Perhaps he could carry on the party policies--the policies of Nixon, Benson, Dirksen and Goldwater. But this Nation cannot afford such a luxury. Perhaps we could better afford a Coolidge following Harding. And perhaps we could afford a Pierce following Fillmore. But after Buchanan this nation needed a Lincoln--after Taft we needed a Wilson-- after Hoover we needed Franklin Roosevelt. . . . And after eight years of drugged and fitful sleep, this nation needs strong, creative Democratic leadership in the White House.

But we are not merely running against Mr. Nixon. Our task is not merely one of itemizing Republican failures. Nor is that wholly necessary. For the families forced from the farm will know how to vote without our telling them. The unemployed miners and textile workers will know how to vote. The old people without medical care--the families without a decent home--the parents of children without adequate food or schools--they all know that it's time for a change.

But I think the American people expect more from us than cries of indignation and attack. The times are too grave, the challenge too urgent, and the stakes too high--to permit the customary passions of political debate. We are not here to curse the darkness, but to light the candle that can guide us through that darkness to a safe and sane future. As Winston Churchill said on taking office some twenty years ago: if we open a quarrel between the present and the past, we shall be in danger of losing the future.

Today our concern must be with that future. For the world is changing. The old era is ending. The old ways will not do.

Abroad, the balance of power is shifting. There are new and more terrible weapons--new and uncertain nations--new pressures of population and deprivation. One-third of the world, it has been said, may be free- -but one-third is the victim of cruel repression--and the other one- third is rocked by the pangs of poverty, hunger and envy. More energy is released by the awakening of these new nations than by the fission of the atom itself.

Meanwhile, Communist influence has penetrated further into Asia, stood astride the Middle East and now festers some ninety miles off the coast of Florida. Friends have slipped into neutrality--and neutrals into hostility. As our keynoter reminded us, the President who began his career by going to Korea ends it by staying away from Japan.

The world has been close to war before--but now man, who has survived all previous threats to his existence, has taken into his mortal hands the power to exterminate the entire species some seven times over.

Here at home, the changing face of the future is equally revolutionary. The New Deal and the Fair Deal were bold measures for their generations--but this is a new generation.

A technological revolution on the farm has led to an output explosion--but we have not yet learned to harness that explosion usefully, while protecting our farmers' right to full parity income.

An urban population explosion has overcrowded our schools, cluttered up our suburbs, and increased the squalor of our slums.

A peaceful revolution for human rights--demanding an end to racial discrimination in all parts of our community life--has strained at the leashes imposed by timid executive leadership.

A medical revolution has extended the life of our elder citizens without providing the dignity and security those later years deserve. And a revolution of automation finds machines replacing men in the mines and mills of America, without replacing their incomes or their training or their needs to pay the family doctor, grocer and landlord.

There has also been a change--a slippage--in our intellectual and moral strength. Seven lean years of drouth and famine have withered a field of ideas. Blight has descended on our regulatory agencies--and a dry rot, beginning in Washington, is seeping into every corner of America--in the payola mentality, the expense account way of life, the confusion between what is legal and what is right. Too many Americans have lost their way, their will and their sense of historic purpose.

It is a time, in short, for a new generation of leadership--new men to cope with new problems and new opportunities.

All over the world, particularly in the newer nations, young men are coming to power--men who are not bound by the traditions of the past--men who are not blinded by the old fears and hates and rivalries-- young men who can cast off the old slogans and delusions and suspicions.

The Republican nominee-to-be, of course, is also a young man. But his approach is as old as McKinley. His party is the party of the past. His speeches are generalities from Poor Richard's Almanac. Their platform, made up of left-over Democratic planks, has the courage of our old convictions. Their pledge is a pledge to the status quo--and today there can be no status quo.

For I stand tonight facing west on what was once the last frontier. From the lands that stretch three thousand miles behind me, the pioneers of old gave up their safety, their comfort and sometimes their lives to build a new world here in the West. They were not the captives of their own doubts, the prisoners of their own price tags. Their motto was not "every man for himself"--but "all for the common cause." They were determined to make that new world strong and free, to overcome its hazards and its hardships, to conquer the enemies that threatened from without and within.

Today some would say that those struggles are all over--that all the horizons have been explored--that all the battles have been won-- that there is no longer an American frontier.

But I trust that no one in this vast assemblage will agree with those sentiments. For the problems are not all solved and the battles are not all won--and we stand today on the edge of a New Frontier--the frontier of the 1960's--a frontier of unknown opportunities and perils-- a frontier of unfulfilled hopes and threats.

Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom promised our nation a new political and economic framework. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal promised security and succor to those in need. But the New Frontier of which I speak is not a set of promises--it is a set of challenges. It sums up not what I intend to offer the American people, but what I intend to ask of them. It appeals to their pride, not to their pocketbook--it holds out the promise of more sacrifice instead of more security.

But I tell you the New Frontier is here, whether we seek it or not. Beyond that frontier are the uncharted areas of science and space, unsolved problems of peace and war, unconquered pockets of ignorance and prejudice, unanswered questions of poverty and surplus. It would be easier to shrink back from that frontier, to look to the safe mediocrity of the past, to be lulled by good intentions and high rhetoric--and those who prefer that course should not cast their votes for me, regardless of party.

But I believe the times demand new invention, innovation, imagination, decision. I am asking each of you to be pioneers on that New Frontier. My call is to the young in heart, regardless of age--to all who respond to the Scriptural call: "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed."

For courage--not complacency--is our need today--leadership--not salesmanship. And the only valid test of leadership is the ability to lead, and lead vigorously. A tired nation, said David Lloyd George, is a Tory nation--and the United States today cannot afford to be either tired or Tory.

There may be those who wish to hear more--more promises to this group or that--more harsh rhetoric about the men in the Kremlin--more assurances of a golden future, where taxes are always low and subsidies ever high. But my promises are in the platform you have adopted--our ends will not be won by rhetoric and we can have faith in the future only if we have faith in ourselves.

For the harsh facts of the matter are that we stand on this frontier at a turning-point in history. We must prove all over again whether this nation--or any nation so conceived--can long endure--whether our society--with its freedom of choice, its breadth of opportunity, its range of alternatives--can compete with the single-minded advance of the Communist system.

Can a nation organized and governed such as ours endure? That is the real question. Have we the nerve and the will? Can we carry through in an age where we will witness not only new breakthroughs in weapons of destruction--but also a race for mastery of the sky and the rain, the ocean and the tides, the far side of space and the inside of men's minds?

Are we up to the task--are we equal to the challenge? Are we willing to match the Russian sacrifice of the present for the future--or must we sacrifice our future in order to enjoy the present?

That is the question of the New Frontier. That is the choice our nation must make--a choice that lies not merely between two men or two parties, but between the public interest and private comfort--between national greatness and national decline--between the fresh air of progress and the stale, dank atmosphere of "normalcy"--between determined dedication and creeping mediocrity.

All mankind waits upon our decision. A whole world looks to see what we will do. We cannot fail their trust, we cannot fail to try.

It has been a long road from that first snowy day in New Hampshire to this crowded convention city. Now begins another long journey, taking me into your cities and homes all over America. Give me your help, your hand, your voice, your vote. Recall with me the words of Isaiah: "They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run and not be weary."

As we face the coming challenge, we too, shall wait upon the Lord, and ask that he renew our strength. Then shall we be equal to the test. Then we shall not be weary. And then we shall prevail.

Thank you.

Columbia Point, Boston MA 02125 (617) 514-1600

Monday, 9 May 2016

Its Just A Ride....and Just A Choice Between Fear And Love...But Whose Running The Roller Coaster......

IT'S A CHOICE......BETWEEN FEAR OR LOVE.....as above so below

I.G.Farben and Standard Oil Financed Hitler. I.G. Farben id Bayer and Big Pharma. 
Standard Oil Is The Oil Industry......all wars financed and controlled by them and banks......

And Then  There Is The Bible.......the biggest lie to control humanity in 2000 years.  

What has been passed down to us as the New Testament is a very confused historical account, yet these facts as presented by the Church of Rome have become matters of faith and dogma based on deliberate concealment of the truth - a deception that the Church is keen to uphold to this day.

Now, Australian publisher/entrepreneur Tony Bushby has lifted the veil of deceit in his book, "The Bible Fraud"—the result of 12 years of painstaking full-time research. The central thesis is one that other scholars and mystics, as far back as Michelangelo and Sir Francis Bacon, have known about and have referred to in codes and ciphers: that the figure we know of as Jesus Christ is a composite character. According to Bushby, the real story is about twin brothers, the illegitimate sons of the Roman Emperor Tiberius and Princess Mariamne Herod, the granddaughter of King Herod, who had Nabatean Arab/Hasmodean ancestry. The two boys were brought up in the Essene community; indeed, the Essenes had a prophecy about twin Messiahs, so the brothers seemed to fit the bill. The elder, Judas Khrestus, became the sword-wielding Galilean revolutionary ("the Wicked Priest"), while the younger, the Rabbi Jesus (or Yeshu'a), had a ministry with strong links to the Druids of Gaul and Britain and actually became a Druid King.

Bushby analyses many Gospel passages where it seems that two completely different personalities are interwoven. He charts the early genealogies showing that the genetic heritage of the Rabbi Jesus mingled with the Druidic/Celtic lines and was reseeded into the Roman imperial line several times down to Constantine. And he delves into how the Church was created, along with its dogma and official texts, dovetailing along the way with Laurence Gardner's substantive thesis.


This book goes deeply into the sacred science that has been passed down through cultures as diverse as the Egyptian, Chaldean, Greek, Druidic, Hebrew and even Australian Aboriginal and New Zealand Maori, and has found its way into the mystery schools including the Knights Templar, Freemasons, Rosicrucians and other occult orders.

Bushby's main focus is on the Egyptian mysteries as coded into the Giza plateau, in the Book of the Dead and Book of Thoth, in the Tarot and the divinely given script of the Torah (the first five books of the Old Testament). The sacred knowledge could be revealed only to initiates trained to receive the awesome energy that comes when the transcendental key is unlocked (Jesus apparently was one such initiate).

Regarding the Giza plateau, Bushby gives insights into the revered black pyramidal Benben stone believed to have fallen from heaven, the sacred rites held within the Great Pyramid and the existence of other pyramids at Giza—including a Black Pyramid. According to Masonic texts, it was demolished in 1759 by a Scottish faction supported by English Freemasons, motivated by the possible discovery of treasure. Archival illustrations, maps and satellite photographs add weight to the evidence. The discussion of how the symbolic script of the Torah came about is fascinating, for it is based on the vertical spiral of light—the Rainbow Serpent—first seen in the original Benben stone and revealed through a "magic" 22 rotations. Bushby uncovers many more secrets in this stunning book.

COMING UP FOR VATILEAKS FOLLOWERS  Genuinely new information

There are persistent rumours in Rome that highly placed officials in the Vatican have long had evidence that both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are of human origin. Those rumors are authenticated in the upcoming publication of two new books by VatiLeaks, and from those publications, the following information is to be revealed to the world for the first time:

The nature of Divinity, and how it was lost in all Bibles published since 265 BCE.Why popes must lie.The ‘religious secret’ of the Ancient Egyptian Mystery Schools.The use of extra-terrestrial technology to create the Original Sacred Scripture.The pages of the Koran ‘not to be made public’, and their damaging link to vital Gospel narratives.The secret properties of Sacred Scripture, and why it has always been considered ‘Divine’.

For a long time now, there has been a widespread belief that something important has been concealed from the world about the origin of the Christian religion, and this site is to disclose exactly what it is.

In the most disturbing revelation in the history of Christianity, VatiLeaks is soon to reveal the core secret of the Knights Templar, the Cathars, the Rosicrucians, the Priory of Sion, and the information that made Abbe Sauniere of Rennes-Le-Chateau rich and famous... the true identity of Christ.


Wednesday, 4 May 2016

FootFlexes: Ka Gold Jewelry

FootFlexes: Ka Gold Jewelry: Egyptian Jewelry click here to go to website and purchase or view Mother Earth Pendant description The mother earth pen...

Product Description

All profits from the sale of this pendant will be donated 
to organizations that deal with ecological matters

The mother earth pendant was created to express and strengthen the connection between us, humanity and the only home we have, Earth. The systematic destruction and devastation of natural resources are interfering with the delicate ecological balance of the planet. We are seeing rapid climatic changes taking place these days, damage to nature, to rain forests, destruction of coral reefs and the disappearance of millions of species in a matter of decades. The resources of Planet Earth are being destroyed – water, earth, the air we breathe, trees and the oceans. Large parts of humanity are today awakening to this fact and understanding the desperate need for change. 

The four circles crossing eachother are part of the sacred geometry structure known as the SEED OF LIFE. The full structure is composed from seven intersecting circles which contain the basic mathematical laws of existence. The four intersecting circles are known as the Third Day of Genesis when according to the biblical story the oceans, the lands, the trees and the plants were created...

Hanging from the bottom of the pendant is a smaller medallion on which is engraved the question in Hebrew - “will you change it?” ("HATESHANU") This word is mentioned in the Biblical Code and although opinions vary as to the veracity of the Code, it did succeed in prophesying different historical events such as mass wars and the murder of Prime Minister Rabin. It is interesting to note that when texts in the Bible Code foresee such events, next to the section always appears the question “will you change it?” The future is not fixed; rather it is composed of almost an infinite number of possibilities, each one of which leads to a different possible future. 

Around the word “will you change it?” is a passage from the prophet Isaiah “Say the letters backwards” which can be interpreted in two ways – tell or read the events backwards – in other words reveal future, or read the letters from the end to the beginning. It is fascinating to note that below the passage appear two words written from the end to the beginning “change the time”.

The future of Mother Earth and the destiny of humanity are in the hands of each one of us!